When Khieu Samphan and Hou Youn fled into the countryside at the end of April, they did so in genuine fear for their lives. Sihanouk\'s threats against them had become increasingly frequent and menacing. His information was that the two men were still alive. Despite his threats he had not ordered their deaths, and Lon Nol assumed him that in this case the army had not killed the two deputies. But the prince could not prove a negative. The conviction rapidly developed among the politically conscious in Phnom Penh and the provinces that the two leftists were indeed dead, brutally executed by the prince\'s security forces, with his blessing. The ever-active rumour mill in Phnom Penh seemed to be consistent on the details of their deaths. The two men had been tortured, and then crushed to death beneath the tracks of a bulldozer. Three years later, after Sihanouk had been deposed, this theory seemed to receive circumstantial verification when the then Cambodian delegate to the United Nations, the veteran conservative Kim Tith. Claimed to have seen a police report that stated Khieu Samphan had been burnt to death with acid, while Hou Youn and Hu Nim, who had gone into the maquis later in 1967, had been crushed beneath bulldozer tracks.Earlier in the year both the Vietnamese communists and China had given pledges of their respect for Cambodia\'s territorial integrity and its existing boundaries.\n\nThe Khmer Rouge leadership was said to be unknown and divided, and three of its supposed leaders were pronounced dead-\"ghosts\"-in Washington; there was no one with whom Kissinger could talk.\n\nAs we all see clearly foreign authors/writers who have written in their books on Cambodian history like they are trying to find a needle being thrown into the dark bottom of South China Sea as above-mentioned. So, if Khieu Samphan, Pol Pot, Ieng Sary, Hou Youn and Hu Nim were really the fugitives of Samdech Euv Sihanouk\'s Sangkum Reastre Niyum. Why didn\'t they kill him when Phnom Penh was completely liberated on 17th April 1975? Because the Khmer Rouge Leaders and Yuon Angkar Leu/Cap Tren who really hated the feudalist king like SamdechEuv Sihanouk. Do my foreign readers know about Khmer Mores? The answer is a very few foreigners know about it. So I would like my foreign readers to know a little about Khmer Mores:\n \nKhmers are born with their honesty, trustworthy, friendliness, respectfulness, jealousness and revengefulness...etc. \n\nSo, we take a word of \"Revengefulness\" as an example; if [you] bully or kill one of my family members, I will kill [you] too in revengefulness. Therefore, Samdech Euv Sihanouk should not be kept alive during Vietnamese Hidden faces Behind Killing Fields from 1975-1979. Samphan, Pol Pot and IengSary should have finished off his life while they could to do so in revengefulness because all the powers were intheir hands. (They had all powers only around in Phnom Penh, not in the countryside where was ruled by Yuon Angkar Leur/Cap Tren who brutally killed too far many Cambodian innocence.) Ieng, Kampuchea, Khmer, Pol, Pot, Rouge, Sary, Sihanouk, Vietcong